Welcome!

**Our website is currently under construction.**

THE USA OFFICE IS CLOSED:
Tuesday 6/11/24
Wednesday 6/12/24
Friday 6/14/24

Welcome to the University Staff Association website! Here you can find important information about your benefits, dues, Weingarten rights, and more!

We highly encourage you to stop by our office at 108 Hampshire House at any time, Monday-Friday, between 9:00am-4:30pm. If you cannot make it during those hours, or if our office is closed during that time, please feel free to schedule an appointment at usa@umass.edu.

 

UMass Admin Illegally Privatized Advancement, State Auditor Finds

State Auditor DiZoglio Says Even UMass Must Comply with the Law

Dear USA Members,

Over the past year and a half, the UMass Amherst administration, led by President of the private UMass Amherst Foundation Arwen Duffy and former Chancellor Kumble Subbaswamy, has forced through its plan to privatize more than 100 jobs and eliminate the Advancement division. You have rallied and written letters and emails in protest of the administration’s actions, which have endangered our friends’ and colleagues’ livelihoods and retirements. Together with our siblings in the Professional Staff Union (PSU) we have rounded up support against these privatizing attacks from U.S. Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, Congressman Jim McGovern, and state legislators including Senator Jo Comerford and Representative Mindy Domb. 

We now have this news to share: on May 31, 2024, the Office of the State Auditor (OSA) issued its final determination that UMass Amherst violated the Taxpayer Protection Act (TPA) when it privatized and outsourced Advancement operations from UMass Amherst to the private University of Massachusetts Amherst Foundation. 

The TPA, commonly known as “the Pacheco Law,” is intended to prevent private businesses from enriching themselves at the taxpayer’s expense. If any public institution is going to privatize any of its work, it must prove that the private business can provide at least the same level of service, but at a cheaper price.

USA and PSU have argued all along that UMass Amherst was recklessly rushing their privatization scheme–and now, the State Auditor agrees: “After reviewing this matter,” says the OSA’s final determination, “we are unable to determine that this outsourcing produced financial savings at a higher quality of public service.”

Additionally, the OSA found that:

  1. UMass Amherst was required by law to seek a determination from OSA prior to privatizing Advancement and failed to do so.
  2. When given a second opportunity, UMass Amherst could not demonstrate to the OSA that the privatization of Advancement produced financial savings at a higher quality of public service.
  3. The entire UMass system, including all other campuses, must comply with the TPA “in all respects,” now and in the future.

The fight to save public work and bring these positions back isn’t over, and we continue to believe that all public work should be done by public employees subject to public oversight and for the public good. 

We furthermore believe that this illegal forced privatization is part of a larger pattern of disregard for the UMass community that includes low pay, excessive workloads and bias in discipline and terminations. These are all issues which our bargaining team will address, and we know that when we stand together, we win.

We stand in solidarity with PSU who have done incredible work fighting this fight. We will have more privatization news in the coming weeks and months, so stay tuned. 

In Solidarity,

Mary Malinowski, President and Sheila Gilmour, Vice President

Privatization; its history on campus and steps forward.

Imagine: you’re very good at your job. You like it. You’ve been working for the common good, for UMass Amherst, the State’s premier public university, for years, and every year, you’re getting closer to vesting in the state retirement system. Or maybe you’ve already hit your ten-year mark; maybe you’ve been doing the job for decades. You breathe a little easier knowing that your years of effort and modest salary have earned you a secure future.

And then one day, out of the blue, you receive an email from UMass management telling you that all that work may have violated multiple laws. That your pension is at risk. That in order to protect your future, you may no longer work as a public employee. That you must instead go to work for the private UMass Amherst Foundation (UMAF). Imagine that you and your officemates receive a very public pink slip from the Chancellor of UMass himself, and that your entire division of approximately 100 people–co-workers and friends–will also be liquidated.

This is not a fantasy: all of this happened over the course of six months, from December 2022 – May 2023, when the University privatized Advancement–and it appears that the administration and the UMAF may be on the hunt for more state jobs to cut.

What is USA & PSU doing to fight the loss of state jobs? What can you do to protect yours?

Read on for answers to these questions – but first, a little history.

How Management at UMass Amherst Privatized 100+ State Jobs

In December 2022, the university approached the unions claiming that the Massachusetts State Retirement Board (MSRB) had concerns about state employees at UMass in the Advancement division who performed services for the private UMass Amherst Foundation (UMAF). UMass management claimed that state pensions were at risk, they called into question the legitimacy of any fundraising work performed by public employees, and cited a state law that says: “in no event shall an employee of the [public] institution spend more than twenty-five percent of his work hours engaged in services for a [private] foundation.”

UMass management and UMAF then jointly hired a private attorney who presented a suite of scenarios to PSU and other campus unions for reorganizing and privatizing Advancement, which ranged from the somewhat disruptive (some state Advancement positions privatized) to total liquidation (nearly all state Advancement positions privatized).

The unions demanded that management bargain over the restructuring of Advancement and submitted a proposal that would ensure that state workers did the vast majority of Advancement work–which management immediately rejected. Instead, management informed the unions that they were going to change the “flow of funds” for all donations: no longer would donor funds go to UMass Amherst. They would all go to the private UMAF. This was a reversal of decades’ worth of practice at UMass, but management and its private attorney claimed that a “clean break” between UMass and the UMAF was needed in order to protect state-worker pensions.

In effect, this meant that no state worker could perform any fundraising function, for fear of risking their credible service and pension eligibility, and that all advancement functions would become the sole responsibility of the private UMAF.

PSU, along with USA and other UMass unions, has been fighting back for more than a year. We’ve staged rallies and letter-writing campaigns, all-member meetings, and speak-outs. We’ve gotten the news out to media outlets around the region and country. We’ve won the support of U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey, as well as U.S. Congressman Jim McGovern. State legislators Jo Comerford and Mindy Domb supported the unions’ proposal to keep this public work publicly accountable at the university. The State Retirement Board itself publicly declared that they had no concerns about Advancement members’ retirement eligibility, and State Treasurer Deb Goldberg said, “this situation is clearly and absolutely 100% UMass Amherst’s responsibility,” adding that Advancement employees “have been confronted with a confusing, disruptive, and stressful situation for them and their families.” She demanded that the university “work with their employees” and “work with the union[s]” to resolve the situation. The State Auditor, Diana DiZoglio, sent a letter to Chancellor Subbaswamy asserting that the legal requirements for privatizing Advancement have not been met, and management must immediately stop the privatization process. And the state Department of Labor Relations has found probable cause on four occasions that management may have violated the law in privatizing Advancement.

Yet, despite all of this, UMass management blundered ahead with its disastrous plan. On International Workers Day, May 1st, 2023, then-Chancellor Subbaswamy emailed the entire Advancement division that layoff notices were being prepared and announced that UMass would go through with “the transfer of fundraising, alumni relations, and related Advancement activities to the UMass Amherst Foundation.”

One hundred and twenty-five of your friends, comrades, and colleagues had their jobs eliminated, their lives upended, and were forced to either find a new job, leave UMass all together, or go work at the private UMAF because of the unique nature of the work they do.

What to Watch out For

Despite the “clean break” that management forced, state workers all across the university are still being asked to do fundraising, alumni relations, and related advancement activities. You may be asked to help create MinuteFunds or work on alumni communications, to plan and promote donor events, or to send fundraising solicitations–all job duties that management has claimed as cause for privatization.

Without admitting it publicly, the university has completely reversed the “clean break” legal argument they used to privatize advancement functions and eliminate scores of state positions. Management now maintains that state workers can do this advancement work for a private foundation, as long as the employee does not spend more than twenty-five percent of their work hours doing so. But the university has so far refused to track time in service for a foundation in our singular time tracking system, HR Direct. In fact, Brian Harrington, of UMass Labor Relations, wrote an email to PSU suggesting that workers who fail to perform services for the private UMAF could be subject to discipline for insubordination.

And recently, a PSU member alerted the union to the fact that the president of the private UMAF, Arwen Staros Duffy, quietly approached a dean, called at least one state worker’s duties into question, and raised concerns about the member’s pension.

Duffy is using the very same job-cutting privatization playbook that started this whole mess, while Harrington is insisting that we must perform duties that put us at risk.

The difference is that this time, instead of taking on an entire division out in the open, management now seems to be singling out employees, one-by-one.

What We Can Do Together to Protect Your Job

You are not alone in your desire to do good work for a public university and receive fair pay and a well-earned retirement in return for years of service.

There is strength in numbers. If you are asked to do work for the private UMAF (or the system-wide private UMass Foundation):

1. Politely ask to have the task reassigned (if you feel comfortable doing so). 2. Reach out to USA President Mary Malinowski or PSU Co-Chairs Brad Turner and Andrew Gorry immediately to let them know If you have been asked to perform work for UMAF or think that the work you are doing may be cause for concern. 3. Record your time doing this work in this Google form

In the meantime, the UMass unions, along with our legal counsel, are working to get management to add a UMAF time code to HR direct, so that we can objectively document how many hours we work in service of the private UMAF using the same time-tracking system in which we have over fifty time codes to log everything from regular work-time, vacation time, voting time, time for jury duty, and blood-donation time, etc.

This is not the end of the fight to maintain the dignity and integrity of our public work. Together, we can ensure that no public UMass Amherst employee ever again has to go through the trauma of having their life’s work invalidated and their future imperiled by management.

UMass Amherst Unions Condemn Crackdown on Peaceful Campus Protest

May 8, 2024

*** If you need any assistance from our union in regards to this matter, please reach out to our office.***

UMass Amherst Unions Condemn Crackdown on Peaceful Campus Protest

In Solidarity with our co-unions: PSU, AFSCME, MSP & GEO, the University Staff Association condemns the ongoing and unnecessary acts of force in the breakup of a peaceful encampment. arrests of over 100 faculty, staff and students and the violent nature of how these arrests took place.

AMHERST, Mass. – Yesterday evening, May 7, 2024, the University of Massachusetts Amherst Chancellor Javier Reyes invited more than a hundred-armed riot police onto campus to violently break up a peaceful encampment of students, staff, and faculty protesting the war in Gaza. Reports and video have emerged of police pushing protestors and kicking them while on the ground, and other forms of unnecessary force. The five largest unions at UMass Amherst, representing thousands of staff, faculty, and graduate workers, condemn the ongoing criminalization of free speech, the over-policing of campus, the infliction of violence upon our students, and the administration’s decision to endanger the health and safety of the entire campus rather than negotiate solutions.

Though Chancellor Reyes has claimed, in an email to the UMass campus, that the administration began bargaining in good faith with student leaders of the encampment at 4 p.m. and continued negotiating for more than an hour and a half, eyewitnesses report that a cavalcade of police cars began arriving soon after 5 p.m.– in the middle of what Reyes characterized as “civil discourse to help bridge our differences.”

It did not have to go like this. We are appalled by police crackdowns in response to campus protests–at Columbia, the University of California Los Angeles, the University of Texas Austin, the University of Wisconsin Madison. In this national atmosphere, Reyes’s decision to ask the police to break up the protest was tantamount to inviting police violence.

By contrast, UMass could have sided with campuses that chose peaceful resolutions.
University administrations at Wesleyan, Northwestern, Brown, Rutgers, the University of Minnesota, and the University of California, Riverside, among others, have negotiated with students and avoided violence.

Chancellor Reyes has claimed that his action was justified by the fact that the protesting students did not obtain a land-use permit–a violation that carries the weight of a civil penalty. But there is no valid justification for using force against students simply because they pitched a few tents on the campus lawn, a crime that carries the same weight as jaywalking.

Unfortunately, the UMass administration’s resort to the violent suppression of student protest is part of a larger pattern of disregard for its community that includes understaffing, overwork, low pay, bias in discipline, and the forced privatization of more than 100 state workers–an action decried by everyone from state legislators Jo Comerford and Mindy Domb to Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey.

We believe that the University of Massachusetts Amherst, the state’s flagship university, should be a place of free inquiry, intellectual challenge, and camaraderie, a place that supports free expression, the right to assembly, and the welfare of students and staff alike. UMass works because we do, and we work because we care for our students–for their intellects as well as their physical safety. Such beliefs cannot flower when the Administration’s response to peaceful protest is to call in the riot police.

In Solidarity,

The University Staff Association Board